Team Hub
Salary Cap
Tennessee Titans
Cap Overview
The Titans are in an enviable cap position today, carrying $53.5M in room ranked second in the league and just $3.8M in dead money ranked 28th, meaning virtually no financial baggage is weighing them down. The rollover of $18.2M ranked seventh adds further flexibility heading into the offseason. However, the runway shortens quickly: committed spending jumps to $314.3M next season before dropping sharply to $216.8M the season after and falling all the way to $83.7M three seasons out, and next year's projected cap room falls to $20.3M ranked 22nd in the league. The message is clear: the time to spend aggressively on fixing the offensive line, center, and depth-chart gaps is now, before the commitment curve tightens. With 31 expiring contracts also on the books, roster churn will be significant, and prioritizing which young players to retain before they hit the open market is a critical task.
Top Cap Hits
| Player | Pos | Age | OVR | Cap Hit | Yrs Left | % of Cap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT · 27 · OVR 73 · 3 yrs | LT | 27 | 73 | $26.3M7.7% | 3 | 7.7% | |
| DT · 29 · OVR 95 · 5 yrs | DT | 29 | 95 | $22.1M6.4% | 5 | 6.4% | |
| WR · 31 · OVR 78 · 2 yrs | WR | 31 | 78 | $15.2M4.4% | 2 | 4.4% | |
| LEDGE · 29 · OVR 78 · 3 yrs | LEDGE | 29 | 78 | $14.9M4.4% | 3 | 4.4% | |
| CB · 27 · OVR 79 · 3 yrs | CB | 27 | 79 | $14.0M4.1% | 3 | 4.1% | |
| REDGE · 27 · OVR 77 · 1 yrs | REDGE | 27 | 77 | $13.4M3.9% | 1 | 3.9% | |
| SS · 28 · OVR 78 · 3 yrs | SS | 28 | 78 | $11.9M3.5% | 3 | 3.5% | |
| WR · 25 · OVR 84 · 4 yrs | WR | 25 | 84 | $11.3M3.3% | 4 | 3.3% | |
| QB · 24 · OVR 75 · 3 yrs | QB | 24 | 75 | $11.1M3.2% | 3 | 3.2% | |
| CB · 25 · OVR 81 · 3 yrs | CB | 25 | 81 | $10.7M3.1% | 3 | 3.1% |
Contract Cliffs
| Player | Pos | Age | OVR | Cap Hit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REDGE · 27 · OVR 77 | REDGE | 27 | 77 | $13.4M | |
| HB · 29 · OVR 83 | HB | 29 | 83 | $9.3M | |
| HB · 25 · OVR 77 | HB | 25 | 77 | $3.9M | |
| QB · 27 · OVR 68 | QB | 27 | 68 | $3.0M | |
| DT · 31 · OVR 72 | DT | 31 | 72 | $2.5M | |
| RG · 28 · OVR 72 | RG | 28 | 72 | $2.5M | |
| SS · 27 · OVR 75 | SS | 27 | 75 | $2.0M | |
| K · 30 · OVR 76 | K | 30 | 76 | $2.0M | |
| LS · 40 · OVR 65 | LS | 40 | 65 | $1.5M | |
| HB · 25 · OVR 67 | HB | 25 | 67 | $1.4M | |
| TE · 28 · OVR 69 | TE | 28 | 69 | $1.4M | |
| WILL · 25 · OVR 70 | WILL | 25 | 70 | $1.4M | |
| HB · 27 · OVR 71 | HB | 27 | 71 | $1.2M | |
| WR · 29 · OVR 71 | WR | 29 | 71 | $1.2M | |
| LT · 27 · OVR 64 | LT | 27 | 64 | $1.2M | |
| RG · 28 · OVR 63 | RG | 28 | 63 | $1.1M | |
| WR · 28 · OVR 63 | WR | 28 | 63 | $1.1M | |
| FS · 26 · OVR 65 | FS | 26 | 65 | $1.1M | |
| LEDGE · 30 · OVR 68 | LEDGE | 30 | 68 | $1.1M | |
| C · 29 · OVR 67 | C | 29 | 67 | $1.1M | |
| CB · 28 · OVR 72 | CB | 28 | 72 | $1.1M | |
| DT · 30 · OVR 69 | DT | 30 | 69 | $1.1M | |
| FS · 26 · OVR 63 | FS | 26 | 63 | $1.1M | |
| DT · 28 · OVR 65 | DT | 28 | 65 | $1.1M | |
| TE · 26 · OVR 62 | TE | 26 | 62 | $1.1M | |
| WR · 26 · OVR 65 | WR | 26 | 65 | $1.1M | |
| RG · 24 · OVR 64 | RG | 24 | 64 | $1.0M | |
| RT · 25 · OVR 61 | RT | 25 | 61 | $1.0M | |
| SS · 26 · OVR 66 | SS | 26 | 66 | $1.0M | |
| REDGE · 26 · OVR 65 | REDGE | 26 | 65 | $1.0M | |
| CB · 24 · OVR 67 | CB | 24 | 67 | $1.0M |
Committed Cap by Season
Upgrade to Team Hub Rookie
- Salary cap breakdown
- Depth chart analysis
- Roster needs & scheme fit
- Cut candidates & 5-year outlook
- Full sortable roster